A comparison of survival and behavior of lake whitefish following transmitter implantation using electro- or chemical immobilization

Table 3 CJS Model Summaries

Model	Parameter	Description	Estimate	95% CI
(1)	φ(constant), p(constant)
	Monthly survival (φ)	All	0.980	0.970–0.987
	Detection probability (p)	All	0.966	0.953–0.975
(2)	φ(immobilization), p(constant)
	Monthly survival (φ)	TENS	0.981	0.965–0.989
		Eugenol	0.980	0.964–0.989
	Detection probability (p)	All	0.966	0.953–0.975

Cormack–Jolly–Seber model estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for monthly survival (φ) and detection probability (p) of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) acoustically tagged in the Fox River, Wisconsin, for the top two models based on Quasi-Akaike information criterion corrected for low sample size (QAICc) scores (see Table 2 for further information on model selection). TENS = transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; Eugenol = Aqui-S 20E (10% eugenol) at a concentration of 40 mg/L

ISSN: 2050-3385